- The performance of 17-year-olds has been essentially stagnant across all subjects despite a near tripling of the inflation-adjusted cost of putting a child through the K-12 system
- There has been essentially no correlation between what states have spent on education and their measured academic outcomes
- By Daily Mail Reporter
Andrew Coulson who conducted the study believes the answer is simple - that there's no discernible correlation between spending and results.
'What we’ve done over the past 40 years hasn’t worked,' said Coulson, director of the Center For Educational Freedom at the CATO Institute.

The most troublesome question facing education:
Why are results for U.S. public school students so mediocre, despite the
billions of taxpayer dollars spent?

No comments:
Post a Comment